what is TMX?

Founded by former execs from NBC News, ABC News, Hulu, and Daily Mail who all felt the abrasions of content acquisition. There had to be a better way of curating good content for newsrooms, from identification to acquisition, rights and file management. With a foundational goal of focusing on newsroom users in this particular sector of their business, in one year’s time TMX now has over 450 major and local newsrooms in the U.S. using the product as part of their daily workflow.

TMX has developed algorithmically powered ways to identify newsworthy video content, get the rights for use and display it on the platform. Anyone with an account can acquire the rights for free. It's that simple. With their embeddable video player for news websites, users can simply copy and paste the linked media without having to transfer and upload files, relieving the strain of that workflow from the newsroom. For non-internet propagation, users can also download the source files and broadcast them as they need. The business generates money with traditional advertising using targeted pre-roll ads before the video clips begin in TMX’s embedded video player. Advertising revenue is split between TMX and the agency posting the content. One-third of the revenue goes to the person who owns the content, one-third to the people who use it, and TMX keep the rest.

All content is curated from verified and trusted sources including a network of creation partners who produce exclusive content for the platform.

 

My Role

Head of Design & Product.

Responsible for brand, product features and user experience.

Stakeholders

Matt Zimmerman; Founder, Owner, VP of Product

Srivastav Sethupathy; Head of Engineering

Product Team; Software Engineering Teams

 

Business Goals:

Simplify the content acquisition process for news and media agencies, and make the tools accessible to anyone on TMX.

Product Goals:

Design an experience that clearly sells the value of the product, makes it easy to onboard and begin using content.

 

The way that News organizations discover and acquire stories and content is antiquated, manual, and time consuming.

 
 

Once content is discovered, the path to receive permission or license the associated media asset, and acquire the media file itself, is individually negotiated ad hoc. Newsrooms invest heavily in casting a wide net to chase and secure content, but have not invested in efficiencies and standards leaving the process a mess. TMX has created a platform connecting content producers to newsrooms with all the necessary features to offer a comprehensive toolset that newsrooms can rely on to discover and acquire content with incredible efficiency.

The product team is a streamlined partnership between myself (Design) and the Head of Product, who respond to identified customer needs to assemble hyper focused incremental features.  Because of the lean investment, we don’t have downtime to pontificate on aesthetic or build long tailed roadmaps - we make things exact and functional for the problem it is working to solve for our users, then we engage our customers directly as part of a real time experimentation and iteration cycle. We have the luxury to do so, because there is no other product like ours on the market yet. 

It is typically a swift process to standup a new feature within a week and release it to our users. Then we build on that foundational point of value to offer a more robust and comprehensive service. Say for example, going from one email alert for new content—to twelve different configurations of types, sources, and location based relevancies for alerts.

TMX is innovating new Ai powered ways to aggregate and tag content, improve discoverability for news broadcasters and drastically reduce the amount of time spent hunting for newsworthy stories and media assets. They continue to uncover additional opportunities to inject efficiencies in the content acquisition workflows, and the product is evolving rapidly with urgent interest from enterprise level organizations.

baseline Processes

 
  • Talk through the identified Problem. How do we know it’s a problem? What is the customer doing now to try to solve for it? Can we solve it better? How will we know if we’ve solved it? Break down even straightforward customer requests - what problem are they trying to solve for with this request? Are they being too prescriptive with the solution, and there is an easier approach they haven’t thought of?

  • With a comprehensive understanding of the problem domain, you can then articulate what the opportunities are. Then develop a clear and focused design direction that you can share with others and archive for those moments you need context later. Additionally, having some data points for its current state, discuss what failure looks like—and what success looks like. This will allow us to later measure how effective our approaches are.

  • Once the opportunity is clear, as a designer, it’s time to visualize the possible ways in which we can create an experience that will seize the opportunity and allow us to accomplish our goals.

  • Now with a clear understanding of the domain, an articulate view of the opportunities, and a visualization of the possible solution(s) you regroup with the team and see what feels worthy of continued investment. How well do the visualizations support the original intention? What did we learn or notice once we visualized the feature idea? What gaps or new problems might we have created in introducing this new flow?

  • Pursuing certain solutions to problems or new features both require a level of specificity to see at a granular level that not only have to solved for the problem at hand, but at the same time have not added any new problems or conflicts to the rest of the product. Sometimes that as simple as a few higher fidelity designs, sometimes it requires an intricate prototype and user testing. In any case, we are simply trying to outline the next steps with a level of specificity that can be clearly communicate to business stakeholders and tactically executable by engineers and testable by QA.

  • At this point you should have a clear idea of what to go build and only need a minor amount of additional clarity to delegate the work and get rolling on building out your feature. Think of closing a 10% gap in understanding, not 50%. In the unlikely event that your previous step proved unsuccessful, then regroup with the new information, develop a new approach and repeat that cycle until you’re ready to button up the marching orders and move forward into production.

  • At this point, you should be able to blindly hand over documentation and it should be handed back with perfect execution. However that never seems to happen, even in the most ideal of circumstances, so make space to sit down with the engineers to ensure that they have all they need to realize the vision that’s been laid out before them with designs, specs, and user stories.

  • Once it’s been built, launch it and see how effective it is in the real world, and study that reaction and look for ways in which you can further improve if it’s not performing as well as expected, or be thankful the process has served it’s purpose and the goal has been met, and move on to the next domain and opportunity to further the product towards achieving the larger business goals or mission.

 

Case study

↓ 

 
 

Problem

User’s don’t stick around. They come through an email alert, get that piece of content, and bounce.

With our notification features, we’ve trained our users to wait for a notification, deep link to the content item, and then leave the site when they finish their transaction. When users don’t stick around and explore the site, they cannot organically discover any additional content, and thus miss out on lots of new media and coverage opportunities for their newsroom. TMX loses opportunities to grow transactions for acquired content. Building richer AI and content tagging to increase targeted notifications is a longer term investment. How can we more expediently increase engagement in the meantime until our AI platform matures? 

 

Opportunity

We can increase engagement and revenue, potentially with a simplified and more intuitive content hierarchy.

Facilitating a simpler browse experience can increase content discovery and drive engagement, content acquisition, and ultimately lead to an increase in overall revenue for the content owner, the publisher, and TMX. If we get just one more content acquisition per visit, we double our engagement numbers.

Working the process.

 
 

start on paper

I quickly start jotting out thoughts on paper. It’s fluid and free, and it allows me to whittle away at the problem until solutions start to reveal themselves. When considering the problem at hand here, there is a short flow from notification to acquisition, but nothing more. We need to expose more to a user when they arrive on site, and find a compelling way to do so.

 
 

Build like LEGO®

As solutions begin to reveal themselves, I dig into to my design system library for ‘parts’ to build out pseudo wireframes—looking to get all the facets of a solution on one digital space. With all the elements and components is organized as symbols, it’s a swift process to bring ideas to life, and be far closer to a buildable state that if this step is done in a different format.

Looking at the library sparks ideas of how to re-purpose some of the foundational UI components. Coupled with API updates, we can often find an effective way to get something rolling to our users. For ideas which do not yet have a clear UI component for, we need to spend some cycles on creating variations of what is could look like, and then test to figure out what will be most successful.

 

identify quick wins

In this case, when we look at solving for a lack of engagement, the clear place to start is the reviewing the entry point where users start their journey most frequently and identify what might be missing. Most users first arrive through email notifications for content. We designed both the email alerts and the detail views to be simple and sparse, focusing on the content with great prominence, and trying to maintain aesthetic continuity.

On the detail view, we are missing ways to directly access any other content, site navigation is hidden, and any relevant tags are minimally displayed. So these are relatively easy to remedy, at least from a design perspective. We can re-use some card display components to show related content on a single video’s detail view—which is a common approach for most video platforms, which most people interact with, so will likely feel familiar. Beyond this, we look at exposing categories in the top navigation and repurposing our location tagging styles to display hashtags which will require expanding our content id and tagging functionality on the back end.

 

designing additional features

We put those ideas on page, and review. Starting at the top and scanning downward, we expose the top level navigation that was pervasively hidden for aesthetic purposes. We keep our new ‘Home’ button—since when arriving direction at this detail view, there is no ‘Back’ option, so we take them Home where all the good cleared content is featured.

The main content is still featured as it normally would be and we like the continuity when arriving from a similarly styled email alert. We add a new display style and interactive aspect to hashtags, giving them a colorful prominence on the page and a single click search action.

Beyond that we add in our mini-grid component to feature a subset of top related content. This is just a small teaser as we’ve found that adding more isn’t always better, though it would seem so. This is why we need to spend time developing the feature’s logic for the back end so whatever content is featured, can be assuredly good. Our users count on the quality of the content they find on TMX to be top notch so we can’t just show anything—it has to be of high relevance and quality. And theoretically, if the top related content is good, users might go deeper to explore all through the ‘VIEW ALL’ link—which would take them to a grid view collection to browse all relevant content.

 
 

Prototype and test

Make that design move—wire up a prototype. This step, for me, works through the user flow process at the same time as I organize the art-boards and develop and connect each aspect I’m looking to solve. At the pace we work, it’s not uncommon to eat a process sandwich instead of taking on each step one by one.

 
 
 

Once that’s been reviewed and tested with a select group of users—and no fundamental flaws are found with the design that would need another round of thought—we rally the engineers and start planning out the work.

Documentation into development

In addition to writing out the stories for each features, we of course spec out all the UI by designing all the variations necessary for a given use case. Then compile all the design details and specs into epics, user stories and subtasks for sprint grooming where we fill in any missing details and align and commit to the work to bring new features to production in the next sprint.

 

Case Study Results

 

we have received positive feedback from initial user tests thus far.

 

Our assumptions of course are that this feature release will deliver positive results relative to the success numbers we set. However, these features are currently in the documentation phase and should be launching soon.

high-level Product improvements

During my time working with TMX, I have helped to significantly improve the product focus, the marketplace narrative, product coherence and matured the aesthetics which has led to a significantly increased number and caliber of clients. There has been over 500% growth in TMX users, from a subset—to the majority of all national news networks and ownership companies. The product has gone through many phases as the business objectives and investor influence have changed. Throughout all the shifts, I have asked why, or why not, in an effort to simply validate the thinking, pressure test the ideas ever so slightly (as it is my place) and follow in support of the business objectives.

 

What’s next for the product

With such a lean team in TMX, and narrow time window to implement features, there is gap in design quality between the design and its implementation.

Doing a design refinement pass across all features; identifying all the bits of layout inconsistencies, type styles, design discrepancies, animations, etc. that can be improved and seeing to it that it’s fixed up, is a necessary next step. Each feature can be improved with granular attentiveness to detail and requires time investment either throughout development phases, or as a retrospective exercise logging design bugs.

 

fin.